Monday, January 26, 2009

NANCY PELOSI TAKES STIMULUS TO A WHOLE NEW LEVEL

200 million dollars to be exact, and when you watch Nancy talk gibberish like she is a native to Gibberland, then try to explain how birth control will stimulate the economy, keep in mind that she is smarter than Sarah Palin according to the intelligensia...but she does use her hands a lot as though she is stating some sort of fact and its coming any time now and then she nods as though she has stated that missing factoid, hoping it was a complete sentence and that George will just move on...(yea baby that was one long as hell sentence!)
Its going to cut costs. Ok, Nancy please one more time explain to us HOW it will "reduce costs"? We can mate like rabbits without fear of pregnancy? The great governmental rubber is coming to halt the economic downturn folks! WOOHOO! This IS the big BAIL-OUT. Daddy is in the bedroom for good now. Memo: TO: Nancy Pelosi: Stimulating the economy does not mean passing out condoms to the peeps OK, that is a different type of stimulus. Silly democrat, tricks will make kids! But not with economic downturn. Let's not make more mouths to feed, that would be too expensive for Uncle Sam since we are now paying for abortions all over the world and not just here in America. WOW, this administration is shaping up nicely. Birth control and mass abortion, and we wonder why the world hates us. We look more and more like China.

26 comments:

DB said...

Funny, she is just working off a Republican plan to begin with lol. I am judging Obama on how loud the minority party is crying and so far, so good.

As you might have guessed, it's not quite as scandalous as conservatives would have you believe.

[T]he family-planning program that Pelosi supports expanding in the stimulus bill was created in 1972 under the leadership of Republican president Richard Nixon.
What's being proposed is an expansion in the number of states that can use Medicaid money, with a federal match, to help low-income women prevent unwanted pregnancies. - Washington Monthly

Pasadena Closet Conservative said...

She needs to stimulate her face. Too many facelifts.

Nikki said...

DB, I know you are a right-wing sadist, but try not to be so apparent, so we don't know you are strictly in the piss-off business and therefore some of your arguments MAY be legit. So Nixon the crook is who you are crediting for the low income birth control plan, how quaint. Anyone in the 21st century? :)N

Nikki said...

Pasadena, thanks for stopping by...Nancy needs a full brain-lift! :)N

namaste said...

umm, for once i am not gonna say what i am thinking. it's just too outrageous for the blog. and nik, before you get on the phone demanding answers, give me a minute. let me eat my twix candy bar at least.

superbowl time, girlie. get ready for some smack-talking smack downs! wooo-hoooo!! ;)

Nikki said...

Dang! Maria now I am super curious...and yes maybe a post about football and how the Cardinals are gonna kick some booty! BRING ON THE SMACK...and the snacks. :)N

WomanHonorThyself said...

did my comment poof?..lol

Chuck said...

I'm confused. I thought the libtards wanted the government out of their bedrooms?

DB said...

You think that providing funding for family planning is the government getting involved in the bedroom? No one is forcing anyone to use these services. They are making a choice whether or not to use these services. No laws are being made. No rights are even being questioned.

Being against pointless funding is one thing, but not understanding the issue altogether is another.

Nikki said...

DB, it absolutely goes to whether or not this is fiscally responsible. The issue is retarded, Nancy is a tool and anyone who sees this as part of a comprehensive responsible stimulus bill is a hyper partisan. Dems are already out of control in their own stupidity. :)N

DB said...

Yes, I understand. Reread my comment. I see how one can be against this for fiscal reasons. I even question it. But to make a statement that Dems are trying to control what goes on in the bedroom is assinine and only shows how little someone understands this issue.

Nikki said...

Well it may not go to the bedroom but one could argue the uterus...I do understand the point of government staying out of reproductive measures completely and that means not infringing on the right to get an abortion and staying out of family planning period. Its not that huge of a stretch to say complete laissez faire, means hands off to the government altogether. Stay out of reproduction matters period, and that would include providing contraception and abortions. Don't infringe but don't provide...Its the free way! :)N

DB said...

At least you recognize the difference between infringing and providing. That there is my point.

Nikki said...

Unfortunately the pro-choicers don't see it that way, they want to have their cake and eat it too...and that's the way it is...federally funded abortions and birth control, sounds like governmental interference to me...how about neither one and make the argument more pure?

DB said...

I would be fine if the government was not allowed to give money to perform abortions as long as abortion choice continues to be right. Unfortunately, the pro-lifers don't see it that way, they want to have their cake and eat it too. I'll be ready to approach the middle ground when they are, but until then I will keep pushing for Obama to stay the course.

Nikki said...

And there is the stalemate...the difference is that pro-choicers are having their cake and eating it...pro-lifers are just wanting it. I would go for no federal funding, but no infringement. I guarantee pro-choicers would not go for it and maybe vice versa. :)N

DB said...

I can admit (rather easily, obviously) that the pro-choicers have the upper-hand in this "stalemate". Abortions with restrictions are currently legal and often being supported by USG money and conservative leaders have done virtually nothing to reverse this. I honestly don't see it being too much to ask when the pro-lifers ask not to use USG money. I understand their complaints. But I highly doubt that an agreement meeting in the middle that still allows abortions to be done without USG money will ever be agreed to by those pro-lifers. The pro-lifers will not compromise their ideals/values on this issue and would prefer to lose big than to play any part in an agreement that still allows abortions to be performed. For this reason alone the pro-choicers like me will refuse to budge as it would risk the position they currently hold, which is optimal.

If the pro-lifers can accept unrestricted, privately funded abortions, then I can accept the demand that no USG money is involved nor USG encouragement on the issue in any way, whatsoever. Let's not hold our breath for this one. While we wait for such an agreement, Obama and pro-choicers will continue to make choices available to a wider amount of people using USG money.

Sandi said...

Hey, watch your comments about people talking with their hands. We Italians don't know any other way to talk!!

Oh, yes, GO CARDS!!!!!

Karen said...

And, now, Obama has bowed to conservatives and taken the 'family planning' issue off the table. It's out of the stimulus package. The liberals are steaming.

t.durham said...

Pelosi's condom control plan is nothing more than population reduction by passive means. She said it herself, fewer people means fewer expenses. What's next? killing off the old? This is hand in hand with the United Nations population control plan. Just saying.

Chuck said...

I stand by my comment. Liberals want no governmental regulations on birth control, abortion, but they are completely comfortable with having the government pay for them. My contention is that if we are not going to have the government involved in decisions about birth control or abortion, wew should not have them paying for it.

Khaki Elephant said...

Let's not criticize the fact that Nancy Pelosi's hands move while she talks to express her feelings. With the amount of plastic surgery this woman has seen, facial expression is fairly limited.

Larry T. Durham said...

"With the amount of plastic surgery this woman has seen, facial expression is fairly limited."

Now that's funny!

Johnny Walker Purple said...

You know what would be great Nikki? If you actually made an argument instead of just asserting over and over again that democrats are "retarded". It would make you look like less of a hyper-partisan.

I say government should provide for contraception (abortion is a trickier issue) so as to avoid unwanted pregnancies. Fewer unwanted pregnancies mean fewer wards of the state and less crime, thus lowering costs. Nothing she said or has done in any way resembles population control, government dictating of reproductive choices, or anything sinister.

Chuck:
Liberals (you might want to rethink using the word libtard if you actually want to be taken seriously) don't want the government dictating reproductive decisions. Providing money for contraceptives and abortions does not mandate choice but provides options for those without the access (think abused 16 yr old or high school students with overbearing parents in the case of condoms) or funds to those who have already freely made a choice. It's a clear difference.

DB said...

Johnny (nice name by the way), I agree, but short of that you are barking up the wrong tree. Your arguments for family planning will only find dissent here because "family planning" to them implies abortion. They prefer unexpected pregnant teenagers to crazy witchcraft like birth control and condoms. You are arguing against people who think abstinence only education works.

Nikki said...

Johny Walker Purple, democrats are retarded, its a fact. Who else would name themselves such a retarded name.